I've been eating from 50-75% raw foods now for about two years, and it's obvious to me that eating raw foods is one of the best thing I've done for my body. The one thing I find, though, as I look for more information and connect with more raw foodies, is that I'm a definite minority in a minority way of eating. It seems that most raw foodies think any animal product is anathema! But why? Where is the rationale for that?
Victoria Boutenko, for example, states that human being all come from tropical climates. Oh, really? Tell the Inuit that! Tell Laplanders! Tell the Hunza! The claim makes no sense to me. Now understand, I have a strong Judeo-Christian background, and when I read the scriptures, I see God leading the children of Israel to "the land of milk and honey". That doesn't sound very vegan to me. I also read that all herbs and grain are good for man, but that we should be very sparing in our use of meat, except in times of cold or famine. No problem there, either. My point, I suppose, is that if the Creator tells us to use animal products, and in some climates the population would have died out long ago had they not eaten animals, why, then, are those in search of a more healthful diet so eager to throw out all the wisdom of the ages?
I agree that in our over-processed, phoney-food society, we need to get back to more healthful ways of eating. In fact, I think we need a more agrarian society, and we should all be growing at least part of our own food supply. No one, though, is going to convince me that vegan is the most natural way to eat. I rather like the idea of a land of milk and honey. My goats supply me with delicious raw milk, which I'm free to ferment as kerir or yogurt, make into various cheeses, or drink down fresh--and raw--as it comes. This, too, is raw food, and don't see any good reason not to enjoy it.
Here's to raw health--in all its wonderful flavors!