U.S. Dept of Agriculture, the FDA, and various state governments have been waging a war against raw milk for years. Swat teams hold women and children at gunpoint wihle they haul away "evidence" and "contraband" (raw milk, computer records, dairy equipment) and consumers are treated like children who can't make decisions for themselves. This, of course, is all under the auspices of "protecting" us against our own stupid decisions. Like other socialist policies, this looks well-meaning on the surface, but the loser is always the private citizen, and the winner is always corporatism and agribusiness.
A recent ruling in a Canadian court is a ray of sunshine in an increasingly bleak landscape. Michael Schmidt, an Ontario farmer, was acquited of 19 charges brought against him by the Ontario Ministry of Health. Schmidt had been running a cow share program to provide raw milk to those who would prefer their milk and cheese unpasteurized. You know, the way it's been consumed for millenia.
In today's world, common sense takes a back seat to hysteria and corporate interests, and the uninformed eagerly nod their heads in acquiescence, thankful for Big Brother's solicitude. Others, like myself, see what is happening to our food supply, investigate claims made by public health officials, and compare that to historical data. I, for instance, concluded that raw milk, raw honey, and other raw foods can't be the threat we're told or the human race would have died out long ago. Obviously that didn't happen, despite the lack of officialdom looking over our shoulders and monitoring our every mouthful until the recent past.
If every judge were as thorough as Ontario Judge Paul Kowarsky, it would be a better, safer world. Those who want to drink pasteurized milk would be free to do so, and those who like raw, would be safe from gestapo tactics.
Food protection advocates energy would be better spent protecting us from genetically modified foods, contamination of open-pollinated crops, and providing labeling laws that allow us to know just where the threats in our food actually lay. Instead, they harass small farmers and private food coops, discourage the buy and eat local movement, and work to convince the European Union that GM products don't really need to be labeled, using the long arm of the U.S. government to further the interests of Monsanto et.al.